|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Involution and Destitution in Capitalist Russia
Michael Burawoy
Center for Urban Ethnography, University of California, Berkeley, USA
Pavel Krotov
University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
Tatyana Lytkina
Komi Science Center, Russia
While much has been written on the unprecedented degeneration of the Russian economy, how people survive or do not survive remains a mystery. A close 5-year tracking of workers from a liquidated furniture enterprise in Northern Russia reveals two types of survival strategy: defensive and entrepreneurial. Defensive strategies retreat to a primitive domestic economy in the face of the collapse of industry and agriculture while entrepreneurial strategies reach into the more dynamic sector of trade and service. In both cases families that manage to spread risks among multiple strategies rather than rely on singular ones do better under Russia's precipitous economic involution. By examining the deployment of inherited assets - material, social, skill and citizenship - we see how permutations of Soviet economic strategies are reenacted to survive in the post-Soviet world. Thus, as industry and agriculture have disintegrated, the fulcrum of production and redistribution has moved from factory to household, elevating women's previous role as organizer and executor of the domestic economy. At the same time that men become more marginalized in working class families they have become more dominant within the New Russian Bourgeoisie and the political descendants of the old nomenclatura. Here women are expelled from public decision-making into subordinate, often decorative positions within the household.
Key Words: capitalism family entrepreneurship market transition poverty Russia strategies of survival
Ethnography, Vol. 1, No. 1,
43-65 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/14661380022230633

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Round, C. C. Williams, and P. Rodgers
Corruption in the post-Soviet workplace: the experiences of recent graduates in contemporary Ukraine
Work Employment Society,
March 1, 2008;
22(1):
149 - 166.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Smith and A. Stenning
Beyond household economies: articulations and spaces of economic practice in postsocialism
Progress in Human Geography,
April 1, 2006;
30(2):
190 - 213.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Stenning
Re-placing work: economic transformations and the shape of a community in post-socialist Poland
Work Employment Society,
June 1, 2005;
19(2):
235 - 259.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nichols, S. Cam, W.-c. G. Chou, S. Chun, W. Zhao, and T. Feng
Factory regimes and the dismantling of established labour in Asia: a review of cases from large manufacturing plants in China, South Korea and Taiwan
Work Employment Society,
December 1, 2004;
18(4):
663 - 685.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Blank
Fairytale Cynicism in the 'Kingdom of Plastic Bags': The Powerlessness of Place in a Ukrainian Border Town
Ethnography,
September 1, 2004;
5(3):
349 - 378.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ashwin and T. Lytkina
Men in Crisis in Russia: The Role of Domestic Marginalization
Gender Society,
April 1, 2004;
18(2):
189 - 206.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Pickup and A. White
Livelihoods in Postcommunist Russia: Urban/Rural Comparisons
Work Employment Society,
September 1, 2003;
17(3):
419 - 434.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Clarke
Budgetary Management in Russian Households
Sociology,
August 1, 2002;
36(3):
539 - 557.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Shevchenko
'In Case of Fire Emergency': Consumption, security and the meaning of durables in a transforming society
Journal of Consumer Culture,
July 1, 2002;
2(2):
147 - 170.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Bourdieu
Making the Economic Habitus: Algerian Workers Revisited
Ethnography,
July 1, 2000;
1(1):
17 - 41.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|