Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pilialoha, B. R. U.
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 9, No. 2, 235-247 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430206062079

Motivated Entitativity: Applying Balance Theory to Group Perception

Brian R. U. Pilialoha

Marilynn B. Brewer

The Ohio State University

The focus of the current work is on the motivated aspects of entitativity using the perspective gained from theories of cognitive consistency. The central hypothesis is that balance principles will motivate perceivers to partition the social world in such a way as to achieve a state of consistency between social units and attributed acts. Three studies are reported: one employing content analytic methods to investigate motivated perceptions of the US Supreme Court in the context of the 2000 presidential election, and two laboratory experiments. Results generally supported the prediction that agreement with a court's decision would lead to perceiving the court as an entitative unit, whereas disagreement would lead to ‘de-entifying' the court by differentiating individual members or subgroups. Alternative explanations and implications of these findings for motivated cognition are discussed.

Key Words: balance theory • entitativity • motivation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?