Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Ethnography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erdreich, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Marriage talk

Palestinian women, intimacy, and the liberal nation-state

Lauren Erdreich

The Hebrew University, Israel

In feminist anthropological studies of Palestinian women gender change is often interpreted as contributing to the national struggle. Based on research of Palestinian Israeli university women’s marriage talk, I look at how gender change articulated through liberal discourses can reproduce state national hegemony. Palestinian educated women are forbearers of gender change in that they re-create women’s role in courtship and marriage from one of object to subject. Yet the subject position they take up is of the modern bourgeois individual-the required subject of the nation-state. Their marriage talk reproduces the hegemony of the nation-state by advocating and attaching the women to one of its central mechanisms of sovereignty-intimacy. Further, they espouse this intimacy within the genealogical limits that serve as the basis for definitions of the state’s national character. Thus, even while calling for gender change, they ‘talk’ themselves into oppressive nationally defined power relations of the liberal state.

Key Words: Palestinians • Israel • marriage • liberalism • intimacy • postcolonialism • genealogy • nation-state • university

Ethnography, Vol. 7, No. 4, 493-523 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1466138106073143


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EthnographyHome page
S. Abu-Rabia-Queder
Coping with `forbidden love' and loveless marriage Educated Bedouin women from the Negev
Ethnography, September 1, 2007; 8(3): 297 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]