| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
The everyday civil warMigrant working men, within and against capitalColumbia University, USA In an industrial workplace distinguished by flagrant health and safety violations and a fairly explicit antagonism between the virtually all-male workforce and the plant management, many of the male Mexican/migrant workers' postures of fearlessness and stoic perseverance evinced a sometimes deadly complicity between the compulsions of their masculinity with their own exploitation. While these male workers participated in their own effective subordination to the mandates of their employers, as labor for capital, this article contends that the constitutive role of antagonism and struggle between labor and capital nonetheless defines some of the decisive parameters of everyday life, and thus ought to be central to all critical social inquiry. It becomes crucial then for ethnography in particular to account for the ethnographer's own institutionally mediated social situation and practice. The article therefore examines some of the material and practical conditions of possibility of its own research endeavor, in order to critically and self-reflexively consider the often-agonistic relationship of the ethnographer to the wider politics of workplace ‘training’, managerial surveillance, labor discipline and subordination.
Key Words: capital-labor relation • struggle • Mexican migrants • workplace literacy • masculinity • discipline • surveillance • complicity • politics of ethnography
Ethnography, Vol. 7, No. 2,
243-267 (2006) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
